How we will know when glass ceiling is broken

When a woman is self-absorbed, opinionated, loud, and aggressive as a leader, her staff will likely call her a b***h.  Many women have complained that this is "sexism" so I want to set the record straight:  Yes it is sexism - because if a man is argumentative, opinionated, loud, or aggressive as a leader, his staff will likely call him an a**hole.  I suppose when bad female leaders are called as**holes instead of b***hes this will be a sign that glass ceiling has been deemed broken.

Seriously, I started becoming a better leader when I finally understood the difference between managing and leading.  My personal simplified distinction is that "managing" is focusing on the work; "leading" is focusing on the people.  Working in startups, there is little opportunity for formal leadership training.  It's a shame really, as I've met too many a**holes and b***hes in the workplace that with some training had the capacity to transform themselves into great leaders - but didn't.   Unfortunately, because several visionary leaders got away with being a**holes on the job, like Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, and Larry Ellison, there is a tendency to excuse this behavior in a visionary CEO.  But these are the exceptions - more likely if a CEO acts like this in a startup environment, they'll have a very difficult time hanging on to key staff, and ultimately this has a lot to do with why so many company founders are kicked out of a company.

On leading:  When staff members genuinely have a sense that you care about them, their success and career development, it's amazing how much more productive they become.   Once I understood this, I drastically changed my behavior towards leadership vs. management.  For example, I started having my power lunches, and in each used the opportunity to ask where they saw themselves in 3 years - what organizational title did they aspire to?  Then we'd discuss what positions we should target for them within the company (my department or any other) to get them there. We'd talk about the projects I'd given them, and what besides the work output I wanted them to glean, whether it be better time-management skills, better leadership within a cross-functional team, negotiation skills, or selling skills (for non-salespeople especially!).  This way they could see a direct connection between the project they were working on and a softer skill they needed to develop to be successful in their career longer term.  

Very rarely will you find out that you're an a**hole or a b***h.  If you discover that these terms are used to describe you, I encourage you not to take offense but view it as an opportunity to really look at your leadership style and what your priorities are.  Since these terms will likely be used out of your earshot, those of you who are willing to question whether others would use these terms to describe you are in a PERFECT position to make adjustments.  I have found that the best leaders are highly introspective people.

Here's a question - where do you go to get tips on how to be a better leader?  I can't find really good websites or blogs that aren't geared towards selling a book or consulting services.  Curious if you have found a source that has really impacted your ability to focus on being a better leader, or if this is something you'd like to see more of right here.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 4/14/2008 3:48 PM Les wrote:
    If the group leader is over 30 I would say who they is who they are and they will defend their approach to leadership and management to their (employment) death. This applies equally to males and females. I believe this is mostly about who you are, based on values you acquired long before you came to the company. You either have the right stuff or you don't. This is why I believe leadership and management classes are a joke, a total waste of time. I have only worked for one truly professional org. my entire 25 years after grad school, a major oil company no less. That company had traditional values and mutual respect was the main rule you did not violate no matter how high or low you were in the company. Such values do not exist in 99.99% of the companies out there today. Male/female issue is over-rided by poor values and culture and lack of leaders anymore IMO.
    Reply to this
    1. 4/14/2008 4:24 PM Natalee wrote:
      You're right, values are front and center.  For example, lying.  As a woman professional I was indeed a Hillary supporter, but I can't get past her lying about the sniper fire when she landed in Bosnia.  Outright lying is simply not acceptable or excusable to me in a leader, male or female. This behavior cost her my loyalty, and I was sincerely crushed to have to walk away from her. But I put integrity way above gender in valuing a leader.  I suppose in politics this may mean I am forever disappointed. 

      Reply to this
  • 4/14/2008 9:16 PM Les wrote:
    I don't think we have a great selection here with McCain, Hillary, and Obama. I think if you pressed me I would still chose Hillary because I have a bit more faith in her ability to execute. I agree if sa work colleague has lied big time on something important its hard to reestablish trust.
    Reply to this
  • 8/26/2008 9:07 AM Mike wrote:
    Hi, Natalee--
    Here's a web site that gives the qualities of a good leader and how to acquire them: http://artofmanliness.com/2008/08/17/5-traits-of-true-leadership/">http://artofmanliness.com/2008/08/17/5-traits-of-true-leadership/">http://artofmanliness.com/2008/08/17/5-traits-of-true-leadership/.
    (Please note that while the article is aimed at a male audience, it's definitely applicable to women, too.)
    One quality that isn't mentioned in the article that I think is crucial is honesty: honesty up and down the chain of command. When your employees know they'll get a straight answer from you, they'll respect you and have confidence in you, which is what leadership is all about.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.